4.5 Article

Haplotype analyses, mechanism and evolution of common double mutants in the human LDL receptor gene

期刊

MOLECULAR GENETICS AND GENOMICS
卷 283, 期 6, 页码 565-574

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00438-010-0541-8

关键词

Age of mutations inference; Familial hypercholesterolemia; Linkage disequilibrium; Populations history; Tag SNPs

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Health [FIS PI06/0365, RTIC C06/01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), an autosomal dominant inherited disorder resulting in increased levels of circulating plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL), tendon xanthomas and premature coronary artery disease (CAD), is caused by defects in the LDL receptor gene (LDLR). Three widespread LDLR alterations not causing FH (c.1061-8T > C, c.2177C > T and c.829G > A) and one mutation (c.12G > A) with narrow geographical distribution and thought to cause disease were investigated. In an attempt to improve knowledge on their origin, spread and possible selective effects, estimations of the ages of these variants (t generations) and haplotype analysis were performed by genotyping 86 healthy individuals and 98 FH patients in Spain for five LDLR SNPs: c.81T > C, c.1413G > A, c.1725C > T, c.1959T > C, and c.2232G > A; most patients carried two of these LDLR variants simultaneously. It was found that both the c.1061-8T > C (t = 54) and c.2177C > T alterations (t = 62) arose at about the same time (54 and 62 generations ago, respectively) in the CGCTG haplotype, while the c.12G > A mutation (t = 70) appeared in a CGCCG haplotype carrying an earlier c.829G > A alteration (t = 83). The estimated ages of selectively neutral alterations could explain their distribution by migrations. The origin of the c.12G > A mutation could be in the Iberian Peninsula; despite its estimated age, a low selective pressure could explain its conservation in Spain from where it could have spread to China and Mexico, since the sixteenth century through the Spanish/Portuguese colonial expeditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据