3.9 Article

The HMGA1-IGF-I/IGFBP System: A Novel Pathway for Modulating Glucose Uptake

期刊

MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 1578-1589

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/me.2011-1379

关键词

-

资金

  1. Telethon-Italy [GGP04245]
  2. MIUR (Italian Ministry of University and Research) [2006061742_002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We previously showed that loss of the high mobility group A1 (HMGA1) protein expression, induced in mice by disrupting the Hmga1 gene, considerably decreased insulin receptor expression in the major target tissues of insulin action, causing a type 2-like diabetic phenotype, in which, however, glucose intolerance was paradoxically associated with increased peripheral insulin sensitivity. Insulin hypersensitivity despite impairment of insulin action supports the existence of molecular adaptation mechanisms promoting glucose disposal via insulin-independent processes. Herein, we provide support for these compensatory pathways/circuits of glucose uptake in vivo, the activation of which under certain adverse metabolic conditions may protect against hyperglycemia. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation combined with protein-protein interaction studies of nuclear proteins in vivo, and transient transcription assays in living cells, we show that HMGA1 is required for gene activation of the IGF-binding proteins 1 (IGFBP1) and 3 (IGFBP3), two major members of the IGF-binding protein superfamily. Furthermore, by using positron emission tomography with F-18-labeled 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, in combination with the euglycemic clamp with IGF-I, we demonstrated that IGF-I's bioactivity was increased in Hmga1-knockout mice, in which both skeletal muscle Glut4 protein expression and glucose uptake were enhanced compared with wild-type littermates. We propose that, by affecting the expression of both IGFBP protein species, HMGA1 can serve as a modulator of IGF-I activity, thus representing an important novel mediator of glucose disposal. (Molecular Endocrinology 26: 1578-1589, 2012)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据