4.7 Article

High connectivity on a global scale in the pelagic wahoo, Acanthocybium solandri (tuna family Scombridae)

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
卷 17, 期 19, 页码 4233-4247

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03913.x

关键词

cosmopolitan marine species; mitochondrial DNA; nuclear DNA; pelagic fish dispersal; population genetic structure; stock structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The population genetic structure and phylogeography of wahoo, Acanthocybium solandri, were investigated on a global scale with intron six of lactate dehydrogenase-A (ldhA6, 8 locations, N = 213) and mtDNA cytochrome b (Cytb, 10 locations, N = 322). Results show extensive sharing of haplotypes across the wahoo's entire global range, and analyses were unable to detect significant structure (nuclear F-ST = 0.0125, P = 0.106; mtDNA Phi(ST) < 0.0001, P = 0.634). Power analyses indicated 95% confidence in detecting nuclear F-ST >= 0.0389 and mtDNA Phi(ST) >= 0.0148. These findings appear unique, as most other tunas, billfishes, and oceanic sharks exhibit significant population structure on the scale of East-West Atlantic, Atlantic vs. Indian-Pacific, or East-West Pacific. Overall nuclear heterozygosity (H = 0.714) and mtDNA haplotype diversity (h = 0.918) are both high in wahoo, while overall mtDNA nucleotide diversity (pi = 0.006) and nuclear nucleotide diversity (pi = 0.004) are uniformly low, indicating a recent increase in population size. Coalescence analyses yield an estimate of effective female population size (N-eF) at similar to 816 000, and a population bottleneck similar to 690 000 years ago. However, conclusions about population history from our Cytb data set are not concordant with a control region survey, a finding that will require further investigation. This is the first example of a vertebrate with a single globally distributed population, a finding we attribute to extensive dispersal at all life stages. The indications of a worldwide stock for wahoo reinforce the mandate for international cooperation on fisheries issues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据