4.6 Article

Evaluation of Apoptosis Induction by Concomitant Inhibition of MEK, mTOR, and Bcl-2 in Human Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Cells

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 1848-1859

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0576

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH/NCI [CA143805, CA100632, CA055164, CA049639]
  2. Cancer Center Support Grant [CA 16672]
  3. Leukemia SPORE Career Development Award [CA100632-05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aberrant activation of multiple signaling pathways is common in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) cells, which can be linked to a poor prognosis for patients with this disease. Previous research with mTOR or MEK inhibitors revealed cytostatic, rather than cytotoxic, effects in in vitro and in vivo AML models. We evaluated the combination effect of the mTOR inhibitor AZD8055 and the MEK inhibitor selumetinib on human AML cell lines and primary AML samples. This combination demonstrated synergistic proapoptotic effects in AML cells with high basal activation of MEK and mTOR. We next incorporated the BH3 mimetic ABT-737 into this combination regimen to block Bcl-2, which further enhanced the apoptogenic effect of MEK/mTOR inhibition. The combination treatment also had a striking proapoptotic effect in CD33(+)/CD34(+) AML progenitor cells from primary AML samples with NRAS mutations. Mechanistically, upregulation of the proapoptotic protein Bim, accompanied by the downregulation of the antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 (mainly via protein degradation), seemed to play critical roles in enhancing the combination drug effect. Furthermore, the modulation of survivin, Bax, Puma, and X-chromosome-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) expression suggested a role for mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in the cytotoxicity of the drug combination. Consequently, the concomitant blockade of prosurvival MEK/mTOR signaling and the deactivation of Bcl-2 could provide a mechanism-based integrated therapeutic strategy for the eradication of AML cells. (C) 2014 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据