4.6 Article

S1P differentially regulates migration of human ovarian cancer and human ovarian surface epithelial cells

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 7, 期 7, 页码 1993-2002

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0088

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA089228, R01 CA089228-05, R01 CA095042, CA-89228, R01 CA095042-06] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) arises from the epithelial layer covering the surface of ovaries and i.p. metastasis is commonly observed at diagnosis. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), a bioactive lipid signaling molecule, is potentially involved in EOC tumorigenesis. We have found that S 1 P is elevated in human EOC ascites. We show that physiologically relevant concentrations of S1P stimulate migration and invasion of EOC cells but inhibit migration of human ovarian surface epithelial (HOSE) cells. In addition, S1P inhibits lysophosphatidic acid (LPA)-induced cell migration in HOSE but not in EOC cells. We have provided the first line of evidence that the expression levels of S 1 P receptor subtypes are not the only determinants for how cells respond to S1P. Although S1P(1) is expressed and functional in HOSE cells, the inhibitory effect mediated by S1P(2) is dominant in those cells. The cellular preexisting stress fibers are also important determinants for the migratory response to S1P. Differential S1P-induced morphology changes are noted in EOC and HOSE cells. Preexisting stress fibers in HOSE cells are further enhanced by S1P treatment, resulting in the negative migratory response to S1P. By contrast, EOC cells lost stress fibers and S1P treatment induces filopodium-like structures at cell edges, which correlates with increased cell motility. In addition, inhibition of the protein kinase C pathway is likely to be involved in the inhibitory effect of S1P on LPA-induced cell migration in HOSE cells. These findings are important for the development of new therapeutics targeting S1P and LPA in EOC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据