4.5 Article

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors Modulate Proliferation and Angiogenesis in Human Endometrial Carcinoma

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 441-453

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-11-0233

关键词

-

资金

  1. William Walter-Will Trust
  2. Central Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust [620492]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) and retinoid X receptors (RXR) are implicated in the development of several obesity-related cancers. Little is known of either the expression or function of PPARs and RXRs in endometrial cancer although this increasingly common disease is highly associated with both obesity and insulin resistance. We investigated the expression of PPAR and RXR subtypes in human endometrial cancers and normal endometrium with immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry and subsequently showed PPAR/RXR binding preferences by coimmunoprecipitation. To determine the functions of PPARs within the endometrium, we investigated proliferation, apoptosis, PTEN expression, and secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in endometrial cell lines after reducing the expression of PPAR alpha and PPAR gamma with antisense RNA. The functional effects of PPAR ligands were also investigated in vitro. We identified differential expression of PPAR and RXR subtypes in endometrial cancers and discovered that PPAR gamma expression correlated with expression of PTEN. PPAR alpha activation influences endometrial cell growth and VEGF secretion. PPAR gamma activation reduces proliferation of endometrial cells via regulation of PTEN and appears to reduce VEGF secretion. We conclude that the PPAR/RXR pathway contribute to endometrial carcinogenesis by control of PTEN expression and modulation of VEGF secretion. We propose that PPAR ligands should be considered for clinical investigation in early phase studies of women with endometrial cancer. Mol Cancer Res; 10(3); 441-53. (C)2011 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据