4.6 Article

QTL analysis for resistance to bacterial wilt (Burkholderia caryophylli) in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) using an SSR-based genetic linkage map

期刊

MOLECULAR BREEDING
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 495-509

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-011-9639-x

关键词

Bacterial wilt; Carnation; Disease resistance; EST analysis; QTL analysis; SSR markers

资金

  1. National Agriculture and Food Research Organization [211]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacterial wilt (Burkholderia caryophylli (Burkholder) Yabuuchi et al.) is one of the most damaging diseases during carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) cultivation in Japan. To find molecular markers for use in marker-assisted selection, we constructed a simple sequence repeat (SSR)-based genetic linkage map of carnation using an F-2 population of 90 plants derived from a cross between a highly resistant line (85-11) and a susceptible cultivar (Pretty Favvare). To develop a large number of SSR markers, we constructed four new SSR-enriched genomic libraries and conducted expressed sequence tag analysis. We mapped 178 SSR loci into 16 linkage groups. The map covered 843.6 cM, with an average distance of 6.5 cM between two loci. This is the first report of a genetic linkage map based mainly on SSR markers in the genus Dianthus. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis identified one locus for resistance to bacterial wilt in linkage group (LG) B4. The locus explained 63.0% of the phenotypic variance for resistance to bacterial wilt. The SSR markers CES1161 and CES2643 that were closest to the QTL were efficient markers for selecting lines with resistance derived from line 85-11. A positional comparison using SSR markers as anchor loci revealed that LG B4 corresponded to LG A6 in a previously constructed map. We found that the position of the resistance locus derived from line 85-11 was similar to that of the major resistance locus observed for a highly resistant wild species, Dianthus capitatus ssp. andrzejowskianus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据