4.1 Article

Serum metabonomic analysis of apoE-/- mice reveals progression axes for atherosclerosis based on NMR spectroscopy

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 3170-3178

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4mb00334a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Project) [2010CB529702]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21005022, 31271455, 31200861]
  3. Joint Natural Sciences Fund of The Department of Science and Technology
  4. First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University [GYFYLH201332]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atherosclerosis is a multifactorial and progressive disease commonly correlated with a high fat diet. The aim of this study was to identify potential biomarkers for the early diagnosis and monitoring of the progression of atherogenesis in apoE(-/-) mice using H-1 NMR-based metabonomics. The apoE(-/-) mice were split into four groups according to the duration of high fat feeding (0 w, 2 w, 4 w and 8 w), and each group possessed different pathological characteristics. Serum H-1 NMR-based metabonomics selectively captured the metabotypes that correlated with the degree of atherosclerosis, showing a time-dependent progression from the physiological to pathophysiological status. It was noted that changes in HDL, choline, taurine, glycine and glucose may be regarded as specific biomarkers of the early stage of atherosclerosis. With the progression of atherosclerosis, disorders in the metabolism of amino acids such as valine, alanine and methionine appeared when large atherosclerotic plaques existed. Multiple biochemical disorders involving lipid metabolism, energy and fatty acid metabolism were observed in the progression of atherosclerosis in apoE(-/-) mice. This study demonstrated that H-1 NMR-based metabonomics can provide biochemical information about the progression of atherogenesis and offer a non-invasive means to discover potential biomarkers for the onset and development of atherosclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据