4.1 Article

Systematic analysis of the IgG antibody immune response against varicella zoster virus (VZV) using a self-assembled protein microarray

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS
卷 6, 期 9, 页码 1604-1610

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c003798b

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Edinburgh School of Chemistry
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [BA 2035/3-1]
  3. Bayerisches Staatsministerium fur Wissenschaft, Kultur und Kunst (Bayerisches Genomforschungsnetzwerk)
  4. EaStCHEM
  5. Medical Research Council [G0501453] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. MRC [G0501453] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Varicella zoster virus (VZV) is a human herpesvirus encoding at least 69 distinct viral proteins which causes chickenpox after primary infection and shingles during reactivation and which is particularly important in pregnancy and immunocompromised patients. Current serodiagnostic tests are either based on whole cell lysates or glycoprotein preparations. In order to investigate the humoral immune response to VZV infection or vaccination in more detail, and to improve the currently available diagnostic assays, we developed a nucleic acid programmable protein array (NAPPA) containing all 69 VZV proteins and performed a detailed analysis of 68 sera from individuals with either no, a previous or an acute VZV infection. In addition to the known reactive glycoprotein antigens (ORF 5, ORF 14, ORF 31, ORF 37, ORF 68), we discovered IgG antibodies against a variety of other membrane (ORF 2, ORF 24), capsid (ORF 20, ORF 23, ORF 43) and tegument (ORF 53, ORF 9, ORF 11) proteins, as well as other proteins involved in virus replication and assembly (ORF 25, ORF 26, ORF 28) and the transactivator proteins ORF 12, ORF 62 and ORF 63. All of these antigens were only reactive in a subset of VZV-positive individuals. A subset of the newly identified VZV antigens was validated by western blot analysis. Using these seroreactive new VZV antigens, more sensitive assays and tests distinguishing between different clinical entities may be developed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据