4.5 Article

Association and expression study of MMP3, TGFβ1 and COL10A1 as candidate genes for leg weakness-related traits in pigs

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 3893-3901

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-011-1168-5

关键词

Leg weakness; Osteochondrosis; Gene polymorphism; Association; Pig

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [FK20315135C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study was aimed to determine the association between metalloproteinase 3 (MMP3), transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF beta 1) and collagen type X alpha I (COL10A1) gene polymorphisms with traits related to leg weakness in pigs. Three hundred Duroc x Pietrain cross breds (DuPi) and 299 pigs of a commercial population (CP) were used for the experiment. DuPi animals were examined for 10 different traits describing leg and feet structure, osteochondrosis (OC) scores and bone density status. Data of OC score at condylus medialis humeri, condylus medialis femoris and distal epiphysis ulna regions of CP were used for association analysis. Significant association (P < 0.05) was found for MMP3 SNP (g.158 C > T) with OC at head of femur and bone mineral density in the DuPi population. Association (P < 0.05) was found between SNP of TGF beta 1 (g.180 G > A) with rear leg score and the principle component denoting both OC and feet and leg scores in the DuPi population. No association was found between COL10A1 (g.72 C > T) and leg weakness related traits. The associations of SNPs with OC traits could not be confirmed in the commercial population. Expression analysis of the three candidate genes was performed to compare between healthy and OC. TGF beta 1 was found to be highly expressed (P < 0.05) in the OC compared to healthy cartilages, but no significant different expressions were observed for MMP3 and COL10A1 genes. The present finding suggested that TGF beta 1 and MMP3 genes variants have an effect on some of the leg weakness related traits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据