4.5 Article

Role of post translational modifications and novel crosstalk between phosphorylation and O-beta-GlcNAc modifications in human claudin-1,-3 and-4

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 1359-1369

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-011-0870-7

关键词

Claudins; Cancer; Post translational modifications; Palmitoylation; O-glycosylation; Yin Yang; Phosphorylation; In silico

资金

  1. Hi-Tech Research and Development (863) Program of China [2009AA02Z111]
  2. National Key Technologies R & D Program of China [2009ZX10004-309]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30872223]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The precise characterization of post translational modifications (PTMs) is important for the understanding of protein regulatory mechanisms and their role in disease. However, experimental studies on PTMs, especially with multifunctional proteins are difficult to follow and investigate. Bioinformatic tools are therefore helpful in predicting key protein modifications. To study the role of PTMs in claudin proteins, specifically claudin-1, -3 and -4 in the onset or progression of human cancers, we performed an in silico study of various PTMs and investigated their interplay. Given that the activity of claudins is known to be influenced by two types of PTMs, specifically palmitoylation and kinase-dependent phosphorylation, we predicted two conserved regions in the topological domains of claudin-1, -3 and -4 as potential palmitoylation sites. Furthermore, conserved phosphorylation residues, which may be targets for kinases and can alter claudin's ability to maintain the integrity of tight junctions, were identified. To our knowledge, this is the first report to suggest O-glycosylation of claudin proteins, as well as a potential novel interplay between phosphorylation and O-glycosylation at Yin Yang sites. Thus, our findings may facilitate the production of anti-cancer drugs, and suggest that novel therapeutic strategies should target post translational events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据