4.8 Article

Gene Loss and Parallel Evolution Contribute to Species Difference in Flower Color

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 28, 期 10, 页码 2799-2810

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr109

关键词

anthocyanins; flower color; gene loss; Iochroma; parallel evolution

资金

  1. Duke University's Center for Evolutionary Genomics
  2. National Institutes of Health NRSA [F32GM080082]
  3. National Science Foundation [DEB-0448889, DEB-0841521]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the importance of regulatory and functional sequence evolution in generating species differences has been studied to some extent, much less is known about the role of other types of genomic changes, such as fluctuation in gene copy number. Here, we apply analyses of gene function and expression of anthocyanin pigment pathway genes, as well as cosegregation analyses in backcross populations, to examine the genetic changes involved in the shift from blue to red flowers in Andean Iochroma (Solanaceae). We demonstrate that deletion of a gene coding for an anthocyanin pathway enzyme was necessary for the transition to red floral pigmentation. The downregulation of a second pathway gene was also necessary for the novel flower color, and this regulatory pattern parallels the genetic change in the two other red-flowered species in the sister family Convolvulaceae in which flower color change has been examined genetically. Finally, we document a shift in enzymatic function at a third locus, but the importance of this change in the transition to red flowers depends on the exact order with which the three changes occurred. This study shows that gene inactivation or loss can be involved in the origin of phenotypic differences between species, thereby restricting the possibility of reversion to the ancestral state. It also demonstrates that parallel evolution of red flowers in three different species occurs via a common developmental/regulatory change but by mutations in different genes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据