4.8 Article

Neutral Evolution of Robustness in Drosophila microRNA Precursors

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 28, 期 7, 页码 2115-2123

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr029

关键词

neutral evolution; robustness; pre-microRNA; purifying selection; secondary structure

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [EF-0742803]
  2. James S. McDonnell Foundation
  3. National Institutes of Health [LM010009-01]
  4. Emerging Frontiers
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0742803] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutational robustness describes the extent to which a phenotype remains unchanged in the face of mutations. Theory predicts that the strength of direct selection for mutational robustness is at most the magnitude of the rate of deleterious mutation. As far as nucleic acid sequences are concerned, only long sequences in organisms with high deleterious mutation rates and large population sizes are expected to evolve mutational robustness. Surprisingly, recent studies have concluded that molecules that meet none of these conditions-the microRNA precursors (pre-miRNAs) of multicellular eukaryotes-show signs of selection for mutational and/or environmental robustness. To resolve the apparent disagreement between theory and these studies, we have reconstructed the evolutionary history of Drosophila pre-miRNAs and compared the robustness of each sequence to that of its reconstructed ancestor. In addition, we replayed the tape of pre-miRNA evolution via simulation under different evolutionary assumptions and compared these alternative histories with the actual one. We found that Drosophila pre-miRNAs have evolved under strong purifying selection against changes in secondary structure. Contrary to earlier claims, there is no evidence that these RNAs have been shaped by either direct or congruent selection for any kind of robustness. Instead, the high robustness of Drosophila pre-miRNAs appears to be mostly intrinsic and likely a consequence of selection for functional structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据