4.8 Article

Molecular Basis of Adaptive Shift in Body Size in Drosophila melanogaster: Functional and Sequence Analyses of the Dca Gene

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 28, 期 8, 页码 2393-2402

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr064

关键词

body size; wing; cline; Dca; adaptation; Drosophila melanogaster

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP0770245, FL100100066]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/E006574/1]
  3. Australian Research Council [FL100100066, DP0770245] Funding Source: Australian Research Council
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/E006574/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NERC [NE/E006574/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Latitudinal body size clines in animals conforming to Bergmann's rule occur on many continents but isolating their underlying genetic basis remains a challenge. In Drosophila melanogaster, the gene Dca accounts for approximately 5-10% of the natural wing size variation (McKechnie SW, Blacket MJ, Song SV, Rako L, Carroll X, Johnson TK, Jensen LT, Lee SF, Wee CW, Hoffmann AA. 2010. A clinally varying promoter polymorphism associated with adaptive variation in wing size in Drosophila. Mol Ecol. 19:775-784). We present here functional evidence that Dca is a negative regulator of wing size. A significant negative latitudinal cline of Dca gene expression was detected in synchronized third instar larvae. In addition, we clarified the evolutionary history of the three most common Dca promoter alleles (Dca237-1, Dca237-2, and Dca247) and showed that the insertion allele (Dca247), whose frequency increases with latitude, is associated with larger wing centroid size and higher average cell number in male flies. Finally, we showed that the overall linkage disequilibrium (LD) was low in the Dca promoter and that the insertion/deletion polymorphism that defines the Dca alleles was in strong LD with two other upstream sites. Our results provide strong support that Dca is a candidate for climatic adaptation in D. melanogaster.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据