4.3 Article

Tyrosine dephosphorylation regulates AMPAR internalisation in mGluR-LTD

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE
卷 40, 期 2, 页码 267-279

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcn.2008.10.014

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council (MRC) UK
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) UK
  4. Ontario Mental Health Foundation
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP-42396]
  6. MRC
  7. BBSRC [BB/F011326/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. MRC [G0601813, G0601509] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F011326/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Medical Research Council [G0601509, G0601813] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-term depression (LTD) can be induced at hippocampal CA1 synapses by activation of either NMDA receptors (NMDARs) or group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), using their selective agonists NMDA and (RS)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine(DHPG), respectively. Recent studies revealed that DHPC-LTD is dependent on activation of postsynaptic protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs), which transiently dephosphorylate tyrosine residues in AMPA receptors (AMPARs). Here we show that while both endogenous GluR2 and GluR3 AMPAR Subunits are tyrosine phosphorylated at basal activity, only GluR2 is dephosphorylated in DHPG-LTD. The tyrosine dephosphorylation of GluR2 does not occur in NMDA-LTD. Conversely, while NMDA-LTD is associated with the dephosphorylation of GluR1-serine-845, DHPG-LTD does not alter the phosphorylation of this site. The increased AMPAR endocytosis in DHPG-LTD is PTP-dependent and involves tyrosine dephosphorylation of cell Surface AMPARs. Together, these results indicate that the Subunit selective tyrosine dephosphorylation of surface GluR2 regulates AMPAR internalisation in DHPG-LTD but not in NMDA-LTD in the hippocampus. Crown Copyright (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据