4.5 Article

Progesterone metabolism in adipose cells

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 298, 期 1-2, 页码 76-83

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.09.034

关键词

20 alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone; Adipocyte; Omental; Differentiation; Aldo-keto reductases 1C

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present study was to investigate pathways of progesterone metabolism in human adipose cells. Adipose tissue samples from the omental (OM) and subcutaneous (SC) fat compartments were surgically obtained in women. In isolated mature adipocytes, progesterone was converted to 20 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone as the main metabolite, most likely through the activity of aldo-keto reductases 1C1, 2 and 3 (20 alpha-HSD, 3 alpha-HSD type 3 and 17 beta-HSD type 5, respectively). In cultured preadipocytes, progesterone was converted to several metabolites identified using bidimensional thin layer chromatography, with or without the dual inhibitor of 5 alpha-reductase type 1 and 2 (17 beta-N,N-diethylcarbamoyl-4-methyl-4-aza-5 alpha-androstan-3-one (4-MA)). Major metabolites identified in OM and SC preadipocytes which were incubated for 24h with C-14-labelled progesterone were 20 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone, 5 alpha-pregnane-3 alpha/beta-ol-20-one, 5 alpha- and 5 beta-pregnanedione, 5 alpha- and 5 beta-pregnane-20 alpha-ol-3-one, 5 alpha-pregnane-3 alpha/beta-ol-20-one and 5 beta-pregnane-3 alpha/beta-20 alpha-diol. Induction of preadipocyte differentiation increased expression levels of AKR1C1 and modified the pattern of progesterone metabolism substantially, leaving 20 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone as the main metabolite generated. On the other hand, progesterone itself showed no consistent effect on adipocyte differentiation. In conclusion, preadipocytes and lipid-storing, mature adipocytes efficiently generate progesterone metabolites in women, which is consistent with rather modest effects progesterone on abdominal fat cell differentiation. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据