4.6 Article

Marine algal carotenoids inhibit angiogenesis by down-regulating FGF-2-mediated intracellular signals in vascular endothelial cells

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 380, 期 1-2, 页码 1-9

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11010-013-1651-5

关键词

Marine algae; Fucoxanthin; Siphonaxanthin; FGF-2; Angiogenesis

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)
  2. Government of Japan
  3. Kieikai Research Foundation
  4. [23380124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Discovery of natural compounds as effective angiogenesis inhibitors has become an important approach in the prevention of cancer. We previously demonstrated the anti-angiogenic potential of two marine algal carotenoids, fucoxanthin and siphonaxanthin. In this study, we evaluated the molecular mechanisms of the anti-angiogenic activity of those two carotenoids using human umbilical vein endothelial cells. This study showed that both fucoxanthin and siphonaxanthin suppress the mRNA expression of fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2) and its receptor (FGFR-1) as well as their trans-activation factor, EGR-1. But, the mRNA expression of VEGFR-2 did not show significant effect by those two carotenoids. Further, those two marine algal carotenoids down-regulate the phosphorylation of FGF-2-mediated intracellular signaling proteins such as ERK1/2 and Akt. Inhibition of FGF-2-mediated intracellular signaling proteins by those carotenoids represses the migration of endothelial cells as well as their differentiation into tube-like structures on Matrigel. These results demonstrate for the first time the possible molecular mechanism underlying the anti-angiogenic effects of fucoxanthin and siphonaxanthin and suggest that these effects are due to the down-regulation of signal transduction by FGFR-1. Our findings imply a new insight into the novel bio-functional property of marine algal carotenoids which should improve current anti-angiogenic therapies in the treatment of cancer and other pro-angiogenic diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据