4.6 Article

Crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis in the regulation of paclitaxel-induced cell death in v-Ha-ras-transformed fibroblasts

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 348, 期 1-2, 页码 61-68

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11010-010-0638-8

关键词

Raf-1 kinase; Autophagy; Apoptosis; Paclitaxel; XIAP; Chemotherapy

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2009-0064464]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0064464] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The previous studies by this author group has shown that paclitaxel, a mitotic inhibitor used in breast cancer chemotherapy, inhibits cell growth via induction of Raf-1-dependent apoptosis. In this article, the role of autophagy in paclitaxel anticancer action was investigated using v-Ha-ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells. Paclitaxel induced a notable increase in the number of fluorescent particles labeled with monodansylcadaverine (MDC), a specific marker for autophagic vacuoles. MDC-labeled vacuoles clearly exhibited the fluorescent-tagged LC3 in cells transiently overexpressing GFP-LC3 (a protein that associates with autophagosome membranes). However, autophagy inhibition with 3-methyladenine (3-MA) failed to rescue v-Ha-ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells from paclitaxel-induced cell death. More interestingly, the apoptosis inhibition by overexpression of the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) did not fully block the cell death by paclitaxel, implying that apoptosis inhibition might accelerate the autophagic components of the paclitaxel response. Conversely, Raf-1 shRNA expression protected against paclitaxel-induced cell death through the simultaneous inhibition of both autophagy and apoptosis. These results suggest that both autophagy and apoptosis act as cooperative partners to induce cell death in v-Ha-ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cells treated with paclitaxel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据