4.7 Article

Intercellular Variation in Signaling through the TGF-β Pathway and Its Relation to Cell Density and Cell Cycle Phase

期刊

MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M111.013482

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union [222635, 241481]
  2. EU-Strep project ENLIGHT (ENhanced LIGase based Histochemical Techniques)
  3. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  4. Swedish Research Council
  5. European Science Foundation
  6. Atlantic Philanthropies/Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Clinical Discovery Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fundamental open questions in signal transduction remain concerning the sequence and distribution of molecular signaling events among individual cells. In this work, we have characterized the intercellular variability of transforming growth factor beta-induced Smad interactions, providing essential information about TGF-beta signaling and its dependence on the density of cell populations and the cell cycle phase. By employing the recently developed in situ proximity ligation assay, we investigated the dynamics of interactions and modifications of Smad proteins and their partners under native and physiological conditions. We analyzed the kinetics of assembly of Smad complexes and the influence of cellular environment and relation to mitosis. We report rapid kinetics of formation of Smad complexes, including native Smad2-Smad3-Smad4 trimeric complexes, in a manner influenced by the rate of proteasomal degradation of these proteins, and we found a striking cell to cell variation of signaling complexes. The single-cell analysis of TGF-beta signaling in genetically unmodified cells revealed previously unknown aspects of regulation of this pathway, and it provided a basis for analysis of these signaling events to diagnose pathological perturbations in patient samples and to evaluate their susceptibility to drug treatment. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 11: 10.1074/mcp.M111.013482, 1-9, 2012.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据