4.7 Article

Time-resolved Quantitative Proteome Analysis of In Vivo Intestinal Development

期刊

MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M110.005231

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Postnatal intestinal development is a very dynamic process characterized by substantial morphological changes that coincide with functional adaption to the nutritional change from a diet rich in fat (milk) to a diet rich in carbohydrates on from weaning. Time-resolved studies of intestinal development have so far been limited to investigation at the transcription level or to single or few proteins at a time. In the present study, we elucidate proteomic changes of primary intestinal epithelial cells from jejunum during early suckling (1-7 days of age), middle suckling (7-14 days), and weaning period (14-35 days) in mice, using a label-free proteomics approach. We show differential expression of 520 proteins during intestinal development and a pronounced change of the proteome during the middle suckling period and weaning. Proteins involved in several metabolic processes were found differentially expressed along the development. The temporal expression profiles of enzymes of the glycolysis were found to correlate with the increase in carbohydrate uptake at weaning, whereas the abundance changes of proteins involved in fatty acid metabolism as well as lactose metabolism indicated a nondiet driven preparation for the nutritional change at weaning. Further, we report the developmental abundance changes of proteins playing a vital role in the neonatal acquisition of passive immunity. In addition, different isoforms of several proteins were quantified, which may contribute to a better understanding of the roles of the specific isoforms in the small intestine. In summary, we provide a first, time-resolved proteome profile of intestinal epithelial cells along postnatal intestinal development. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 10: 10.1074/mcp.M110.005231, 1-12, 2011.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据