4.5 Review

Neuroimaging of mitochondrial disease

期刊

MITOCHONDRION
卷 8, 期 5-6, 页码 396-413

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mito.2008.05.003

关键词

Mitochondrial disease; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS); Neuroimaging; Brain

资金

  1. Mitochondrial Research Guild
  2. Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, WA.
  3. [NIMH-IK01MH069848]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondrial disease represents a heterogeneous group of genetic disorders that require a variety of diagnostic tests for proper determination. Neuroimaging may play a significant role in diagnosis. The various modalities of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allow for multiple independent detection procedures that can give important anatomical and metabolic clues for diagnosis. The non-invasive nature of neuroimaging also allows for longitudinal studies. To date, no pathonmonic correlation between specific genetic defect and neuroimaging findings have been described. However, certain neuroimaging results can give important clues that a patient may have a mitochondrial disease. Conventional MRI may show deep gray structural abnormalities or stroke-like lesions that do not respect vascular territories. Chemical techniques such as proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) may demonstrate high levels of lactate or succinate. When found, these results are suggestive of a mitochondrial disease. MRI and MRS studies may also show non-specific findings such as delayed myelination or non-specific leukodystrophy picture. However, in the context of other biochemical, structural, and clinical findings, even non-specific findings may support further diagnostic testing for potential mitochondrial disease. Once a diagnosis has been established, these non-invasive tools can also aid in following disease progression and evaluate the effects of therapeutic interventions. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. and Mitochondria Research Society. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据