4.2 Article

The major facilitator superfamily-type protein LbtC promotes the utilization of the legiobactin siderophore by Legionella pneumophila

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY-SGM
卷 158, 期 -, 页码 721-735

出版社

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.055533-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cianciotto lab
  2. NIH [AI034937]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Gram-negative bacterium Legionella pneumophila elaborates the siderophore legiobactin. We previously showed that cytoplasmic LbtA helps mediate legiobactin synthesis, inner-membrane LbtB promotes export of legiobactin, and outer-membrane LbtU acts as the ferrisiderophore receptor. RT-PCR analyses now identified IbtC as an iron-repressed gene that is the final gene in an operon containing IbtA and IbtB. In silico analysis predicted that LbtC is an inner-membrane protein that belongs to the major facilitator superfamily (MFS). Although capable of normal growth in standard media, IbtC mutants were defective for growth on iron-depleted agar media. While producing normal levels of legiobactin, IbtC mutants were unable to utilize supplied legiobactin to stimulate growth on iron-depleted media and displayed an impaired ability to take up radiolabelled iron. All IbtC mutant phenotypes were complemented by reintroduction of an intact copy of IbtC. When a cloned copy of both IbtC and IbtU was introduced into a heterologous bacterium (Legionella longbeachae), the organism acquired the ability to utilize legiobactin to grow better on low-iron media. Together, these data indicate that LbtC is involved in the uptake of legiobactin, and based upon its predicted location is most likely the mediator of ferrilegiobactin transport across the inner membrane. The data are also a unique documentation of how an MFS protein can promote bacterial iron-siderophore import, standing in contrast to the vast majority of studies which have defined ABC-type permeases as the mediators of siderophore import across the Gram-negative inner membrane or the Gram-positive cytoplasmic membrane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据