4.7 Article

Diversity of Candida zemplinina isolates inferred from RAPD, micro/minisatellite and physiological analysis

期刊

MICROBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 169, 期 5-6, 页码 402-410

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.006

关键词

Candida zemplinina; RAPD analysis; Strain diversity; Non-Saccharomyces; Non-conventional yeast

资金

  1. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [OTKA-81792]
  2. European Union
  3. State of Hungary - European Social Fund [TAMOP 4.2.4.A/2-11-1-2012-0001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts, Candida zemlpinina is one of the frequently isolated and oenologically important species. It is mostly known from European winemaking areas and it has become one of the key species of non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts to study. Investigating the diversity of C. zemplinina isolates is important for a deeper understanding of the non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts and for the yeast starter industry, as numerous researches have pointed to the potential use of this species in winemaking. For assessing the biodiversity of a larger number of strains, RAPD and micro/minisatellite PCR is often the method of choice, however, this technique is often unstandardized. Whereas some laboratories use these methods for species identifications, others apply RAPD primers for determining intraspecies diversity. In this study, we have tested 5 different RAPD and micro/minisatellite primers on strains of C. zemplinina isolated from different locations. We show that after a rigorous PCR-optimization aimed at reproducibility and comparability of band patterns with these PCR-reactions, diversity of different strains from a wide range of geographic locations is relatively low. The analysis of several oenologically important physiological traits of the strains showed a relatively low level of diversity as well. We also demonstrate that the intraspecific diversity of C zemplinina observable with different techniques (RAPD, micro/minisatellite or physiological analysis) may be fairly different and not necessarily comparable. (C) 2013 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据