4.7 Article

Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus: Methicillin-resistant isolates are detected directly in blood cultures by multiplex PCR

期刊

MICROBIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 165, 期 3, 页码 243-249

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2009.03.003

关键词

Staphylococcus aureus; S. epidermidis; S. haemolyticus; Methicillin resistance; Blood multiplex PCR

资金

  1. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  4. Fundacao Universitaria Jose Bonifacio (FUJB)
  5. Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria (ANVISA)
  6. Programa de Nucleos de Excelencia (PRONEX)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we standardized and evaluated a multiplex-PCR methodology using specific primers to identify Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus and their methicillin-resistance directly from blood cultures. Staphylococci clinical isolates (149) and control strains (16) previously identified by conventional methods were used to establish the multiplex PCR protocol. Subsequently, this methodology was evaluated using a fast and cheap DNA extraction protocol from 25 staphylococci positive blood cultures. A wash step of the pellet with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution was performed to reduce PCR inhibitors. Amplicons of 154 bp (mecA gene), 271 bp (S. haemolyticus mvaA gene) and 108 and 124 bp (S. aureus and S. epidermidis species specific fragments, respectively) were observed. Reliable results were obtained for 100% of the evaluated strains, suggesting that this new multiplex-PCR combined with an appropriate DNA-extraction method could be useful in the laboratory for fast and accurate identification of three staphylococci species and simultaneously their methicillin resistance directly in blood cultures. (C) 2009 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据