4.5 Article

Mechanisms in the serotype-independent pneumococcal immunity induced in mice by intranasal vaccination with the cell wall polysaccharide

期刊

MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS
卷 47, 期 3, 页码 177-182

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2009.06.008

关键词

Streptococcus pneumoniae; Cell wall polysaccharide; Vaccine; Colonization

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI067737]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We previously reported that cell wall polysaccharide (CWPS) given to mice intranasally with adjuvant induces serotype-independent immunity to pneumococci. Some strains make CWPS with one phosphocholine group (CWPS/1), but most express two per tetrasaccharide repeat unit (CWPS/2). Here, CWPS/1 and CWPS/2 were equally protective against colonization by CWPS/2-type pneumococci, but the related Streptococcus mitis polymer lacking phosphocholine was non-protective. Previously the protection was shown to be CD4+ T cell-dependent, abrogated by antiserum to interleukin (IL)-17A, and demonstrable in anti body-defective mice. Here, CWPS failed to protect IL-17A receptor knockout mice, further indicating IL-17A-dependence. When commercial CWPS/1 was size-fractionated preparatively, the larger exceeded the smaller molecules in their capacity to prime for IL-17A responses, and only the larger protected against pneumococcal colonization. However, a CWPS-tetanus toxoid conjugate despite raising high titers of phosphocholine antibody - was non-protective, confirming the irrelevance of humoral immunity in this model. The results strengthen the concept that IL-17A-mediated T cell immunity is inducible by zwitterionic polysaccharides with sufficient chain length to provide coiled secondary structure. Coupling CWPS to protein, which paradoxically prevents protection, may occlude this regular linear conformation. We suggest that mucosal immunization with CWPS primes T(H)17 cells, which - upon contact with the phosphocholine of colonizing pneumococci - elaborate IL-17A, enhancing phagocytosis. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据