4.0 Article

Variability of aerosol particles in the urban atmosphere of Dresden (Germany): Effects of spatial scale and particle size

期刊

METEOROLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 195-211

出版社

E SCHWEIZERBARTSCHE VERLAGSBUCHHANDLUNG
DOI: 10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0395

关键词

ultrafine particles; particle exposure; PM; COD

资金

  1. Leibniz PAKT project Feinstaubbelastung in stadtischen Ballungsgebieten am Beispiel von Dresden und Leipzig

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spatial distribution of atmospheric particles in urban atmospheres is of significant concern for public health. However, the concentrations especially of ultrafine particles (diameter < 100 nm) are difficult to predict due to the presence of numerous diffuse particle sources and the generally inhomogeneous terrain in urban roughness layers. This study examines the spatial variability of sub-mu m particle number size distributions (diameter range 5-800 nm) in the urban atmosphere of Dresden, Germany, using multiple site measurements between December 2009 and May 2010. A main result is that particles in the accumulation mode size range (300-800 nm) showed only minor spatial variability. These particles form a rather homogeneous regional background of aerosol that changes only slightly with time. Particle concentrations in the size range 5-300 nm, however, proved to be significantly influenced by the local urban sources and showed an increasing variability with decreasing particle size. Besides the apparently highly variable field of traffic-related particles, a photochemical source of ultrafine particles was identified that showed an unexpectedly high spatial homogeneity across the entire city. The spatial gradients of particle concentrations also depended on wind direction, wind speed, and temperature inversions. The results confirm the high relevance of spatially resolved ultrafine particle measurements for the assessment of health-related exposure and strategies for their monitoring in urban atmospheres.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据