4.7 Article

Divergent effects of hyper- and hypoglycemia on circulating vascular endothelial growth factor in humans

期刊

METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL
卷 57, 期 1, 页码 90-94

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2007.07.022

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is known to be up-regulated by hypoxia, hyperglycemia, and hypoglycemia in vitro. In contrast, it has been found in healthy humans that plasma concentrations of VEGF decrease upon hypoxia under in vivo conditions, indicating that systemic VEGF concentration may be differently regulated than cellular expression. To test the effect of blood glucose levels on VEGF concentrations in vivo, we examined plasma VEGF changes upon brief hyper- and hypoglycemia in healthy male subjects. We rapidly induced in a crossover design hypoglycemia by insulin bolus application of 0.1 U/kg or hyperglycemia by dextrose infusion in 24 healthy young men. Plasma VEGF concentrations were measured at baseline, at the target glucose concentration of <2.2 mmol/L or >10 mmol/L, and after further 5 and 10 minutes. Plasma VEGF concentrations decreased upon hyperglycemia as compared with euglycemic baseline (P =.027), whereas during hypoglycemic condition, there was a trend for an increase (P =.091). Analysis for repeated measurements including both conditions revealed a differential regulation of plasma VEGF levels upon glycemic condition (P=.035). Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that systemic VEGF concentration may be differentially regulated than expression on cellular basis. Because VEGF is a candidate hormone for regulating glucose passage across the blood-brain barrier under critical conditions, it possibly acts as a neuroprotective controller for constant cerebral glucose supply. This may be of relevance for the understanding of VEGF alterations in different pathological states such as diabetes mellitus. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据