4.6 Article

Effect of Positive Health Factors and All-Cause Mortality in Men

期刊

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
卷 42, 期 9, 页码 1632-1638

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d43f29

关键词

PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; BODY MASS INDEX; SMOKING; ALCOHOL INTAKE; COHORT

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AG06945, HL62508]
  2. Coca-Cola Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BYUN, W., J. C. SIEVERDES, X. SUI, S. P. HOOKER, C.-D. LEE, T. S. CHURCH, and S. N. BLAIR. Effect of Positive Health Factors and All-Cause Mortality in Men. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 1632-1638, 2010. Purpose: Although several health-related factors are independently associated with diverse health outcomes, their combined affect on mortality has not been fully described. Methods: We examined the combined effect of several positive health factors, including having normal weight (body mass index = 18.5-24.9 kg.m(-2)), not smoking (not current smoker), consuming a moderate alcohol intake (1-14 drinks per week), being physically active (moderate to high level), and having a higher cardiorespiratory fitness (top two-thirds), on all-cause mortality in 38,110 men aged 20-84 yr from the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study. Results: There were 2642 deaths during an average of 16 yr of follow-up. Compared with men with zero positive health factors, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of all-cause mortality with one, two, three, four, and five positive health factors were 0.78 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.64-0.95), 0.61 (95% CI = 0.50-0.73), 0.54 (95% CI = 0.44-0.65), 0.43 (95% CI = 0.35-0.52), and 0.39 (95% CI = 0.31-0.48), respectively (P for trend <0.001). The combination of five positive health factors accounted for 29% (95% CI = 14%-40%) of population-attributable risk for all-cause mortality. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that targeting more of these modifiable health factors may provide substantial health benefits in middle-aged men.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据