4.4 Article

Weight change and its impact on prognosis after adjuvant TAC (docetaxel-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy in Korean women with node-positive breast cancer

期刊

MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-014-0849-z

关键词

Adjuvant chemotherapy; Body mass index; Breast neoplasm; Weight gain

类别

资金

  1. Catholic Research Coordinating Center of the Korea Health 21 R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea [A070001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to characterize weight changes and analyze their effect on prognosis after threedrug combination chemotherapy using docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) chemotherapy in Korean women with breast cancer. We analyzed weight changes and the effect of these changes on relapse-free survival (RFS) in 108 patients who received adjuvant TAC chemotherapy at the Department of Surgery of St. Vincent's Hospital at the Catholic University of Korea between January 2005 and March 2010. Following chemotherapy, 59 (54.6 %) patients experienced weight gain, with their weight significantly increasing compared to their weight at diagnosis (p < 0.0001). However, weight gain after chemotherapy was not associated with RFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.1; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.4-3.0; p = 0.8955]. No significant weight (at 12 months, p = 0.522; at 24 months, p = 0.632) and body mass index (BMI) (at 12 months, p = 0.381; at 24 months, p = 0.288) changes were observed compared to the weight and BMI at diagnosis, and weight change at 12 months (HR 1.9; 95 % CI 0.6- 6.1; p = 0.2786) and 24 months (HR 2.7; 95 % CI 0.9-8.4; p = 0.0776) was not associated with RFS. The present study suggests that weight gain after adjuvant TAC chemotherapy is common in Korean women with breast cancer. In contrast to previous Western studies, weight gain did not appear to be sustained, and there was no relationship between weight gain and poor RFS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据