4.4 Article

Overexpression of the HIF hydroxylase PHD3 is a favorable prognosticator for gastric cancer

期刊

MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 2710-2715

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-012-0171-6

关键词

Gastric cancer; Differentiation; Prognosis; PHD3; Apoptosis

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypoxia-induced factors (HIFs) play a central role in the adaptive mechanisms of cancer cells to survive under conditions of hypoxia. HIFs are regulated by prolyl hydroxylases (PHDs) among which PHD3 is implicated as a tumor suppressor. We aimed to correlate PHD3 expression with clinicopathologic parameters and to evaluate its prognostic significance in gastric cancer. The 101 tissue samples were collected from 83 resected stages I-IV gastric cancer patients, which were grouped as non-cancerous mucosa (n = 18) and primary carcinoma (n = 83). PHD3 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. We adopted Pearson chi-square test, univariate analysis, multivariate analysis and Kaplan-Meier method. The positive frequency of PHD3 in cancer cells was 42.2%, whereas non-cancerous mucosa had no detectable PHD3. The expression of PHD3 increased significantly from non-cancerous mucosa to cancer. A significant difference was observed between PHD3 expression and tumor differentiation (P = 0.007). The overexpression of PHD3 was associated with well differentiation. In univariate analyses, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (P < 0.0001), pT classification (P < 0.0001), pN classification (P < 0.0001), differentiation (P = 0.0121), peritoneal metastasis (P = 0.0006) and gross features (P = 0.0104) were significantly associated with survival except PHD3 (P = 0.2228) (Table 3). In multivariate analysis, AJCC stage was prognostically independent [hazard ratio (HR), 3.078; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.228-4.252; P < 0.0001]. Overexpression of PHD3 is a favorable prognosticator for gastric cancer. AJCC stage is an independent prognostic factor of gastric cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据