4.4 Article

CD44+/CD24- cells and lymph node metastasis in stage I and II invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast

期刊

MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 1479-1485

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-011-0014-x

关键词

Breast cancer; Lymph node metastasis; Tumor-initiating cells

类别

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo-FAPESP [2008/09294-9]
  2. Fundacao de Apoio ao Ensino, Pesquisa e Assistencia (FAEPA) do Hospital das Clinicas of Ribeirao Preto School of Medicine-University of Sao Paulo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of tumor-initiating cells (CD44(+)/CD24(-)) in solid tumors has been reported as a possible cause of cancer metastasis and treatment failure. Nevertheless, little is know about the presence of CD44(+)/CD24(-) cells within the primary tumor and metastasis. The proportion of CD44(+)/CD24(-) cells was analyzed in 40 samples and in 10 lymph node metastases using flow cytometry phenotyping. Anti-human CD326 (EpCam; FITC), antihuman CD227 (MUC-1; FITC), anti-human CD44 (APC), and anti-human CD24 (PE), anti-ABCG2 (PE), and anti-CXCR4 (PeCy7) were used for phenotype analysis. The mean patient age was 60.5 years (range, 33-87 years); mean primary tumor size (pT) was 1.8 cm (0.5-3.5 cm). The Wilcoxon or Kruskal-Wallis test was used for univariate analyses. Logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis. The median percentage of CD44(+)/CD24(-) cells within primary invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) was 2.7% (range, 0.2-71.2). In lymph node metastases, we observed a mean of 6.1% (range, 0.07-53.7). The percentage of CD44(+)/CD24(-) cells in IDCs was not associated with age, pT, tumor grade and HER2. We observed a significantly enrichment of CD44(+)/CD24(-) and ABCG2(+) cells in ESA(+) cell population in patients with positive lymph nodes (P = 0.02 and P = 0.04, respectively). Our data suggest that metastatic dissemination is associated with an increase in tumorinitiating cells in stage I and II breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据