4.1 Review

Clinical and genetic heterogeneity in hereditary spastic paraplegias: From SPG1 to SPG72 and still counting

期刊

REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE
卷 171, 期 6-7, 页码 505-530

出版社

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2015.02.017

关键词

Hereditary spastic paraplegia; Genetic heterogeneity; Clinical variability; Diagnosis

资金

  1. Inserm
  2. AP-HP
  3. ANR
  4. European Union
  5. E-Rare program
  6. program Investissements d'avenir [ANR-10-IAIHU-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSPs) are genetically determined neurodegenerative disorders characterized by progressive weakness and spasticity of lower limbs, and are among the most clinically and genetically heterogeneous human diseases. All modes of inheritance have been described, and the recent technological revolution in molecular genetics has led to the identification of 76 different spastic gait disease-loci with 59 corresponding spastic paraplegia genes. Autosomal recessive HSP are usually associated with diverse additional features (referred to as complicated forms), contrary to autosomal dominant HSP, which are mostly pure. However, the identification of additional mutations and families has considerably enlarged the clinical spectra, and has revealed a huge clinical variability for almost all HSP; complicated forms have also been described for primary pure HSP subtypes, adding further complexity to the genotype-phenotype correlations. In addition, the introduction of next generation sequencing in clinical practice has revealed a genetic and phenotypic overlap with other neurodegenerative disorders (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, neuropathies, cerebellar ataxias, etc.) and neurodevelopmental disorders, including intellectual disability. This review aims to describe the most recent advances in the field and to provide genotype-phenotype correlations that could help clinical diagnoses of this heterogeneous group of disorders. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据