4.4 Article

A finite element model to accurately predict real deformations of the breast

期刊

MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 1089-1097

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.01.005

关键词

Breast biomechanics; Finite element method; Hyperelastic behaviour; Surgery planning

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology [FIS2005-0520-C03-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most surgical procedures in breast plastic surgery are either reconstructive procedures following oncologic interventions (tumorectomy, quadrantectomy, mastectomy...) or aesthetic ones, both augmentation and reduction. With current techniques, the results of such procedures cannot be fully guaranteed. Usually, surgical planning is based on a photographic and anthropometric study of the breast only. Among others, one of the difficulties that the plastic surgeons have is the noticeable change of the breast shape with the position of the patient. Thus, it is more and more necessary to plan a presurgical methodology to help the plastic surgeon and guarantee the patient a successful result of the intervention. In order to establish a reliable simulation method that could predict a patient-specific outcome after breast surgery, this study started trying to correlate spatial features of the breast between lying and standing up positions. A biomechanical model of breast was proposed and implemented into a finite element context to predict deformations, and from these the breast shape in different positions. The resulting shapes were compared with multimodal images, whereas the breast surface displacements were compared with manually identified landmarks and 3D scanner images. From the results, it can be concluded that the model hereby presented reasonably approximates breast response to gravity forces, therefore providing accurate and useful information to the surgeon planning such surgical procedures. (C) 2008 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据