4.2 Article

A low-cost mesocosm for the study of behaviour and reproductive potential in Afrotropical mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) vectors of malaria

期刊

MEDICAL AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 104-109

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mve.12085

关键词

Anopheles gambiae; cohort survival; large mesocosm; mosquito behaviour; semi-natural enclosure; sugar feeding

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [R01-AI077722]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1032350]
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1032350] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A large-scale mesocosm was constructed and tested for its effectiveness for use in experiments on behaviour, reproduction and adult survivorship in the Afrotropical malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. Giles (Diptera: Culicidae) in temperate climates. The large space (82.69 m(3)) allowed for semi-natural experiments that increased demand on a mosquito's energetic reserves in an environment of widely distributed resources. A one-piece prefabricated enclosure, made with white netting and vinyl, prevented the ingress of predators and the egress of mosquitoes. Daylight and white materials prompted the mosquitoes to seclude themselves in restricted daytime resting sites and allowed the easy collection of dead bodies so that daily mortality could be assessed accurately using a method that accounts for the loss of a proportion of bodies. Here, daily, age-dependent mortality rates of males and females were estimated using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. In overnight experiments, mosquitoes successfully located plants and took sugar meals. A 3-week survival trial with a single cohort demonstrated successful mating, blood feeding, oviposition and long life. The relatively low cost of the mesocosm and the performance of the mosquitoes in it make it a viable option for any behavioural or ecological study of tropical mosquitoes in which space and seasonal cold are constraining factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据