4.6 Article

Improved physical function and physical activity in older adults following a community-based intervention: Relationships with a history of depression

期刊

MATURITAS
卷 70, 期 3, 页码 290-294

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.07.024

关键词

Older adults; Depression; Physical activity; Physical function; Community-based intervention; Older Americans Act program

资金

  1. Georgia Division of Aging Services [427-93-08080870-99]
  2. 12 Georgia Area Agencies on Aging
  3. Department of Foods and Nutrition and the Georgia Agricultural Experimentation, University of Georgia [GEO 00576]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship of a history of depression with moderate physical activity and physical function before and after a physical activity intervention of congregate meal participants in senior centers from all 12 Georgia Area Agencies on Aging (AAA). Participants were a convenience sample of older adults (n = 376, mean age = 76 years, 82% female, 64% Caucasian, 36% African American, 22% a history of depression). The physical activity intervention included educator-led chair exercises that incorporated balls and bands. Pre- and post-tests assessed moderate physical activity and physical function. At the pre-test, a history of depression was not related to moderate physical activity or physical function. Following the intervention there were significant increases in both moderate physical activity and physical function, but a history of depression was a negative predictor of improvements in physical activity when controlled for site, demographics, and health-related conditions. These results provide an evidence base for the effectiveness of this intervention in improving moderate physical activity and physical function in a community setting, but additional efforts may be needed to improve the impact of this type of intervention among older adults with a history of depression. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据