4.0 Article

DISTRIBUTION OF ORGANIC CARBON IN DIFFERENT SOIL FRACTIONS IN ECOSYSTEMS OF CENTRAL AMAZONIA

期刊

REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 232-242

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO
DOI: 10.1590/01000683rbcs20150142

关键词

fractionation; soil organic matter; land use; soil physical fractions

资金

  1. LBA
  2. PELD
  3. PPG7 Project
  4. CNPq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic matter plays an important role in many soil properties, and for that reason it is necessary to identify management systems which maintain or increase its concentrations. The aim of the present study was to determine the quality and quantity of organic C in different compartments of the soil fraction in different Amazonian ecosystems. The soil organic matter (FSOM) was fractionated and soil C stocks were estimated in primary forest (PF), pasture (P), secondary succession (SS) and an agroforestry system (AFS). Samples were collected at the depths 0-5, 5-10, 10-20, 20-40, 40-60, 60-80, 80-100, 100-160, and 160-200 cm. Densimetric and particle size analysis methods were used for FSOM, obtaining the following fractions: FLF (free light fraction), IALF (intra-aggregate light fraction), F-sand (sand fraction), F-clay (clay fraction) and F-silt (silt fraction). The 0-5 cm layer contains 60 % of soil C, which is associated with the FLF. The F-clay was responsible for 70 % of C retained in the 0-200 cm depth. There was a 12.7 g kg(-1) C gain in the FLF from PF to SS, and a 4.4 g kg(-1) C gain from PF to AFS, showing that SS and AFS areas recover soil organic C, constituting feasible C-recovery alternatives for degraded and intensively farmed soils in Amazonia. The greatest total stocks of carbon in soil fractions were, in decreasing order: (101.3 Mg ha(-1) of C -AFS) > (98.4 Mg ha(-1) of C - FP) > (92.9 Mg ha(-1) of C -SS) > (64.0 Mg ha(-1) of C - P). The forms of land use in the Amazon influence C distribution in soil fractions, resulting in short- or long-term changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据