4.3 Article

Late Ordovician scolecodonts from the Qusaiba-1 core hole, central Saudi Arabia, and their paleogeographical affinities

期刊

REVIEW OF PALAEOBOTANY AND PALYNOLOGY
卷 212, 期 -, 页码 85-96

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2014.08.013

关键词

Scolecodont; Polychaete jaw; Late Ordovician; Saudi Arabia; Gondwana; Paleobiogeography

资金

  1. Estonian Research Council [SF0140020s08, ETF9039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports the discovery of Late Ordovician scolecodonts from the Qusaiba-1 core hole, central Saudi Arabia. The collection of about 100 relatively well preserved diagnostic jaws represents one of the richest jawed polychaete faunas from the Gondwanan realm and the first description of scolecodonts from the Arabian Peninsula. Scolecodonts were most diverse and abundant in the Quwarah Member and basal Sarah Formation, corresponding to the Ancyrochitina merga and Tanuchitina elongata chitinozoan zones (latest Katian to early Himantian). The polychaete assemblage contains up to 15 apparatus-based species and is dominated by the globally distributed genera Kettnerites, Oenonites and Atraktoprion, and a new genus of probable ramphoprionid affinity. Additionally, Skalenoprion and Kalloprion? are recorded, both for the first time from Gondwana. Characteristic of the assemblage is very low frequency of taxa with placognath-type jaws. Comparing the Qusaiba-1 assemblage with coeval faunas of Baltica and Laurentia revealed that northern Gondwana was more similar to mid-continent Laurentia than Baltica. High proportion of paulinitids, ramphoprionids and atraktoprionids, and scarcity of placognaths is typical of both northern Gondwana and Laurentia. The Baltic faunas, in contrast, had several endemic genera particularly among placognaths, whereas paulinitids and ramphoprionids were rare. This anomalous biogeographic pattern, diverging from that of most other fossil groups, cannot be fully explained without additional first-hand data from the Middle and early Late Ordovician of Gondwana and Laurentia. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据