4.5 Article

Comparison of biodegradable behaviors of AZ31 and Mg-Nd-Zn-Zr alloys in Hank's physiological solution

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2011.09.042

关键词

Biomedical magnesium alloys; Biodegradable behavior; Bio-environment immersion; Electrochemical test

资金

  1. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [10JC1407400, 11DJ1400301]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China
  3. Doctoral Program Foundation of Institutions of Higher Education of China [20100073110004]
  4. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Metallic Materials [AMM200903]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main challenge for the application of magnesium and its alloy as degradable biomaterials lies in their high degradation rates in physiological environment. In the present work, the biodegradable behavior of a patent magnesium alloy Mg-Nd-Zn-Zr (JDBM) and a reference alloy AZ31 was systematically investigated in Hank's physiological solution. The corrosion rate of JDBM (0.28 mm/year) was much slower than that of AZ31 (1.02 mm/year) in Hank's solution for 240h. After corrosion products were removed, smooth surface of the JDBM was observed by SEM observation compared to many deep pits on the surface of AZ31. Open-circuit potential and potentiodynamic polarization results manifested that pitting corrosion did not occurred on the surface of JDBM at the early period of immersion time due to the formation of a more protective and compact film layer suggested by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy study. The corrosion rate of magnesium alloys was found to slow down in dynamic corrosion in comparison with that in the static corrosion. This provided the basis for scientific evaluation of in vitro and in vivo corrosion behavior for degradable biomagnesium alloy. The present results suggest that the new patent magnesium alloy JDBM is a promising candidate as degradable biomaterials and is worthwhile for further investigation in vivo corrosive environment. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据