4.7 Article

Effect of strain ratio and strain rate on low cycle fatigue behavior of AZ31 wrought magnesium alloy

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.04.051

关键词

Magnesium alloy; Cyclic deformation; Low cycle fatigue life; Strain ratio; Strain rate

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. AUT021 Network of Centres of Excellence
  3. Canada-China-USA Collaborative Research Project on the Magnesium Front End Research and Development (MFERD)
  4. CANMET-MTL
  5. Premier's Research Excellence Award (PREA)
  6. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  7. Ryerson Research Chair (RRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnesium alloys are increasingly used in automotive and aerospace industries for weight reduction and fuel economy improvement. Low cycle fatigue (LCF) behavior of these alloys is an important consideration for the structural applications. The objective of the present investigation was to identify influences of strain ratio and strain rate on cyclic deformation characteristics and fatigue life of an AZ31 extruded alloy. As the strain ratio decreased, stronger cyclic hardening rate, more asymmetric hysteresis loop, smaller stress amplitude, lower mean stress, and higher initial plastic strain amplitude were observed due to increasing compressive stresses. This was considered to be associated with the twinning during cyclic deformation in the compressive phase, and detwinning in the tensile phase. The residual twins acting as barriers to dislocation slip and pile-up were considered to be the main cause for the occurrence of cyclic hardening. Fatigue life increased with decreasing strain ratio and increasing strain rate. Fatigue crack initiation occurred at the specimen surface due to the presence of larger grains near the surface, and fatigue crack propagation was characterized by a mixture of striations and dimple-like ductile fracture features. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据