4.5 Article

Design of (2Z)-2-cyano-2-[2-[(E)-2-[5-[(E)-2-(4-dimethylaminophenyl)vinyl]-2-thienyl]vinyl]pyran-4-ylidene]acetic acid derivatives as D-π-A dye sensitizers in molecular photovoltaics: a density functional theory approach

期刊

RESEARCH ON CHEMICAL INTERMEDIATES
卷 42, 期 5, 页码 4605-4619

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11164-015-2303-z

关键词

(2Z)-2-cyano-2-[2-[(E)-2-[5-[(E)-2-(4-dimethylaminophenyl)vinyl]-2-thienyl]vinyl]pyran-4-ylidene]acetic acid; Electronic properties; Organic solar cell; DFT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of computational methods such as density functional theory (DFT) in material design has attracted considerable attention aimed at achieving efficient dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). A series of novel (2Z)-2-cyano-2-[2-[(E)-2-[5-[(E)-2-(4-dimethylaminophenyl)vinyl]-2-thienyl]vinyl]pyran-4-ylidene]acetic acid derivatives were simulated using DFT and time-dependent DFT for calculations of molecular properties, electronic properties, optical properties, population analysis, global reactivity indices and light harvesting efficiency (LHE). The results showed that incorporation of an F/CH3 substituent on the acceptor unit increased/decreased the charge density on the acceptor unit, thereby increasing/lowering its tendency to accept electrons from the donor unit through a pi-conjugated linker due to the electron-withdrawing/electron-donating effect of F/CH3; this ultimately increased/decreased the highest occupied molecular orbital and lowest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO-LUMO) energy band gap (E-g). The para-amino substituents on the donor unit drastically increased the natural bond orbital (NBO) charges of both the donor and acceptor units of the dyes, i.e. para-CH3 < para-NH2 < para-N(CH3)(2); this agreed well with the ordering of the band gap. Generally, dyes with para-N(CH3)(2) on the donor subunit have longer light absorption wavelengths, a low E-g and a high LHE, which could lead to enhancement of the photocurrent and charge transfer in DSSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据