4.6 Article

Synthesis, structural characterization, and magnetic property of nanostructured ferrite spinel oxides (AFe2O4, A = Co, Ni and Zn)

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 143, 期 1, 页码 203-208

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.08.052

关键词

Nanostructures; Magnetic materials; Precipitation; Heat treatment; Electron microscopy

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund [RSA5580055]
  2. National Nanotechnology Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanostructured ferrite spinels AFe(2)O(4) (A = Co, Ni, Zn) were successfully synthesized via a co-precipitation method using oxalate salt as a precursor in an anionic surfactant system in combination with a simple calcination process. High crystallinity samples of nanoparticle spinels in a grain size range of 15-100 nm were obtained by varying the calcination temperature (300-700 degrees C) and time (1-5 h). Their pore sizes were controlled in a range of 3 nm up to a hundred nm by tailoring the calcination conditions. Raising the calcination temperature was found to decrease the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area, and broaden the pore structure due to enhanced crystal growth and agglomeration of interparticles of spinels. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of ferrite spinels calcined at 300 degrees C showed mesoporous structures with narrow pore size distribution, and the maximum BET surface area of CoFe2O4, NiFe2O4 and ZnFe2O4 were found at 201 (Co), 315 (Ni), and 273 (Zn) m(2) g(-1), respectively. The magnetic hysteresis loops of the ferrite spinels at room temperature demonstrated ferromagnetism in CoFe2O4, superparamagnetism ferromagnetism in NiFe2O4, and paramagnetism in ZnFe2O4. The highest saturation magnetization (M-s), remanent magnetization (M-r), and coercivity (H-c) were obtained from high crystallinity spinels calcined at 700 degrees C. Nanostructured AFe(2)O(4) with high surface area and mesoporosity promises potentials as novel magnetic catalysts. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据