4.6 Article

A study of the lead dioxide electrocrystallization mechanism on glassy carbon electrodes. Part I: Experimental conditions for kinetic control

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 125, 期 1-2, 页码 46-54

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.08.069

关键词

Oxide thin films; Rotating electrode; Cyclic voltammetry; Diffusive mass transport; Direct optical observation; Kinetic control

资金

  1. Generalitat Valenciana (Spain) [GV05/104]
  2. Ministry of Science and Innovation [MAT2009-14004]
  3. Caja de Ahorros del Mediterraneo
  4. Generalidad Valenciana [AORG09/051, ACOMP09/128]
  5. Universidad de Alicante [BII2007-48535854, BII4770]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dependence on chemical and electrochemical variables of lead dioxide electrodeposition on a glassy carbon electrode from Pb(II) aqueous solutions has been studied. Depending on the experimental conditions, the mechanism of lead dioxide electrodeposition may involve kinetic or mass transport control. Both modeling and morphological studies of the nucleation and growth process have been carried out. The analysis of the chronoamperometric curves obtained from potential step experiments required a previous study regarding (i) the experimental solution conditions (pH, Pb(II) concentration), (ii) range of the final step potential to be used, and (iii) the choice of theoretical models used to obtain the kinetic parameters. Direct microscopic observation of the electrode through the initial stages of oxide phase formation has provided independent values of nucleation kinetics parameters (N(0)A), growth constants (k), induction time (t(0)) and their dependence on the electrochemical variables. The fitting of the experimental curves using some of these independent values allowed other ones, with more realistic values, to be obtained. Further discussion on the mechanistic details of the lead dioxide electrodeposition is presented. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据