4.7 Article

Microstructure of selective laser melted nickel-titanium

期刊

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 189-202

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2014.05.017

关键词

Shape memory alloy; NiTi; Selective laser melting; Differential scanning calorimetry; Electron backscatter diffraction; Anisotropic grain

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation within the program NRP 62 'Smart Materials' [406240_126123]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [406240_126123] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In selective laser melting, the layer-wise local melting of metallic powder by means of a scanning focused laser beam leads to anisotropic microstructures, which reflect the pathway of the laser beam. We studied the impact of laser power, scanning speed, and laser path onto the microstructure of NiTi cylinders. Here, we varied the laser power from 56 to 100 W and the scanning speed from about 100 to 300 mm/s. In increasing the laser power, the grain width and length increased from (33 +/- 7) to (90 +/- 15) mu m and from (60 +/- 20) to (600 +/- 200) mu m, respectively. Also, the grain size distribution changed from uni- to bimodal. Ostwald-ripening of the crystallites explains the distinct bimodal size distributions. Decreasing the scanning speed did not alter the microstructure but led to increased phase transformation temperatures of up to 40 K. This was experimentally determined using differential scanning calorimetry and explained as a result of preferential nickel evaporation during the fabrication process. During selective laser melting of the NiTi shape memory alloy, the control of scanning speed allows restricted changes of the transformation temperatures, whereas controlling the laser power and scanning path enables us to tailor the microstructure, i.e. the crystallite shapes and arrangement, the extent of the preferred crystallographic orientation and the grain size distribution. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据