4.7 Article

Activity of Fe supported by Ce1-xSmxO2-δ derived from metal complex decomposition toward the steam reforming of toluene as biomass tar model compound

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 74, 期 -, 页码 133-138

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.001

关键词

Samaria doped ceria; Biomass tar; Reforming; Hydrogen

资金

  1. Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute (KURDI), Kasetsart University
  2. Thailand Research Fund
  3. National Research University (NRU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ceria (CeO2) and samaria doped ceria (Ce1-xSmxO2-delta) powders with various Ce/Sm ratios have been successfully prepared via metal complex decomposition. The catalytic activities of these synthesized materials toward the steam reforming of toluene as model compound of biomass tar were studied with an aim to determine the suitable catalyst for biomass tar decomposition in biomass gasification system. From the study, H-2, CO, CO2, CH4, C2H4 and C2H6 were the main products from the reaction with low carbon deposition observed on the catalyst surface after 18 h operation. Among all catalysts, relatively higher toluene conversion and H-2 yield (32.8%) with greater resistance toward carbon deposition was achieved from Ce0.85Sm0.15O2-delta. To enhance better toluene conversion and H-2 yield, Ce0.85Sm0.15O2-delta was further applied as the catalyst support by impregnating low-cost Fe on its surface; and its reforming activity was compared to Ni and Fe supported over conventional gamma-Al2O3. It was found that, Fe/Ce0.85Sm0.15O2-delta offered significantly higher toluene conversion and H-2 yield than Fe/Al2O3 (55.2% H-2 yield compared to 16.5%). Its reforming activity was also comparable to Ni/Al2O3 with better H-2 yield stability after 72 h operation (16% deactivation for Fe/Ce0.85Sm0.15O2-delta compared to 35% deactivation for Ni/Al2O3). Therefore, Fe/Ce0.85Sm0.15O2-delta has good potential to replace Ni-based catalyst in biomass gasification system. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据