4.2 Article

Contrasting effects of hypoxic conditions on survivorship of planktonic larvae of rocky intertidal invertebrates

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 478, 期 -, 页码 139-+

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps10130

关键词

Hypoxia; Survivorship; Planktonic larvae; Rocky intertidal; Coastal ecosystem; Oregon coast

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Oregon State University Department of Zoology
  3. Hatfield Marine Sciences Center
  4. David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  5. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  6. Wayne and Gladys Valley Foundation
  7. Andrew W. Mellon Foundation
  8. United States Department of Agriculture
  9. national Institute of Food and Agriculture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypoxia is increasing in coastal zones worldwide, with acute effects on demersal fish and benthic invertebrate communities in shallow coastal and estuarine habitats. Less studied are the effects of hypoxia on planktonic larvae of open coastal habitats. Climate change projections suggest intensified hypoxia in open coast upwelling systems, such as the northern California Current Upwelling System, where there has been a recent rise of seasonally persistent inner-shelf hypoxia (dissolved oxygen [DO] < 1.43 ml l(-1)) and anoxia (DO 0 ml l(-1)). We examined survivorship of larval invertebrates exposed to low oxygen conditions in controlled laboratory experiments. Multiple-day hypoxic conditions, resembling DO levels in nearshore Oregon waters, were gene rated by bubbling seawater with nitrogen gas. Tolerance levels among species varied, from larvae of species with little tolerance to hypoxia (e. g. the shore crab Hemigrapsus oregonensis) to species with high tolerance (e. g. the California mussel Mytilus californianus). These contrasting responses among open-coast intertidal taxa suggest that chronic hypoxia or anoxia may have different effects on recruitment success among species and, consequently, on the structure and species composition of open coast intertidal communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据