4.2 Article

Riding the tide: estuarine movements of a sciaenid fish, Argyrosomus japonicus

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 460, 期 -, 页码 221-232

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps09780

关键词

Circatidal rhythms; Movement behaviour; Environmental factors; Telemetry; Argyrosomus japonicus

资金

  1. South Africa/Norway Programme on Research Cooperation (National Research Foundation of South Africa and the Research Council of Norway)
  2. South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity
  3. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The movement behaviour of juvenile dusky kob Argyrosomus japonicus (n = 25) was studied in the 12 km long Great Fish Estuary, South Africa, by collecting telemetry data in relation to tidal conditions over 6.5 mo. Two behavioural patterns were observed. Tagged fish either moved in circatidal rhythms over long stretches up and down the estuary, corresponding to the speed and direction of the rise and fall of the tide, or remained stationary, often in deeper or structured habitats. All individuals alternated between moving (mean 61% of the time) and stationary behaviour. Moving periods occurred during both light and dark periods. However, up-estuary movements were initiated most frequently at night, while down-estuary movements were initiated most frequently at dawn and dusk. The mean distance of the unidirectional movements was approximately 3.2 km. Ground speed for up-estuary movements (0.29 m s(-1)) was faster than for down-estuary movements (0.22 m s(-1)). These findings suggest that juvenile A. japonicus adopt 2 distinct feeding strategies within their turbid estuarine nursery habitats. 'Riding the tide', with minimal energy expenditure, may be a successful strategy when feeding on prey that follow the tidal current. Alternatively, in periods when they adopt a stationary behaviour, they may fulfil their foraging requirements by feeding on stationary and/or passing prey, while at the same time reducing predation risk in sheltered, structured habitats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据