4.2 Article

Growth in the brown shrimp Crangon crangon. II. Meta-analysis and modelling

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 435, 期 -, 页码 155-172

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps09224

关键词

Growth rates; Life cycle; Recruitment; Commercial fishing; Size-at-age; Moult

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection, Germany [03HS030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Existing laboratory and field data on growth were combined, reanalyzed and discussed to generate a holistic temperature-, length-and gender-dependent growth rate (G, mm d(-1)) model for North Sea region brown shrimp Crangon crangon (L.). Length (L, mm) and temperature (T, degrees C) dependent growth rates of Crangon crangon are highly variable within and among studies but decrease with L and increase with T. Applying general nonlinear regression, mean growth was derived as G = 0.02421.T-0.00115.e(0.08492.T).L (r(2)= 0.860). Applying quantile regression (75th percentile), a growth model describing growth of the fastest growing fraction of the population was derived as G(max) = 0.03054.T-0.00104.e(0.09984.T).L (r(2)= 0.857). Female growth rates were higher than male growth rates and were similar to G(max). In a simulation, G and G(max) were used with seasonally varying temperature to generate monthly length trajectories (cohorts). Further, length-based mortality was included and the fraction of each cohort attaining minimal commercial size was calculated. May cohorts (5 mm initial length), representing spring recruitment, grew to 50 mm by November if G was used. Application of the fast growth model (G(max)) allowed for the same length to be reached 2 mo earlier. We conclude that the autumnal peak in adult abundance in the North Sea is most probably due to recruitment from the spring cohort of the same year. Our results suggest that the previous year's summer cohort contributes little to this autumnal peak because of high cumulative and over-wintering mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据