4.2 Article

Identifying critical estuarine seagrass habitat for settlement of coastally spawned fish

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 408, 期 -, 页码 181-193

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps08582

关键词

Estuarine circulation; Larval settlement; Larval and juvenile fish; Hydrodynamic model; Passive particle tracking; Seagrass; Conservation; Essential fish habitat; Passive transport

资金

  1. Gosford City Council
  2. Water Research Laboratory-UNSW
  3. Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identifying and conserving sites with consistently high settlement is necessary for protecting recruitment of coastal fish populations. We investigated the initial settlement patterns of coastally spawned juvenile fish entering 4 temperate estuaries with narrow entrances ( < 500 m wide) on the eastern coast of Australia. Habitat structure (seagrass cover, blade length and syngnathid density), landscape (patch isolation, perimeter to area ratio and distance to ocean) and hydrological factors (maximum current speed, tidal volume and modelled delivery of passive particles) were investigated as possible explanations for settlement patterns into seagrass beds. One site within Lake Macquarie and 1 site within Smiths Lake were found to have consistently high settlement of 9 coastally spawned taxa over different months and were therefore identified as settlement 'hotspots'. The magnitude of tidal volume, the modelled delivery of passive particles and patch isolation together explained 70% of variation in settlement. Sites of high settlement were characterised as (1) being near to a high-volume channel supplying an abundance of larvae and (2) being isolated from other seagrass patches to concentrate settlement. Monthly variation in settlement, while affecting species composition and total fish abundance, did not alter the relative importance of the identified hotspots, suggesting that these common factors were driving settlement across different species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据