4.2 Article

Timing of planulation by pocilloporid corals in the northwestern Philippines

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 370, 期 -, 页码 111-119

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps07659

关键词

Pocillopora; Seriatopora; Stylophora; Reproduction; Planulae; Lunar periodicity; Seasonality; Bolinao; Brooder

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We determined the lunar, seasonal, and diel timing of larval release in several species in the scleractinian family Pocilloporidae at Bolinao in the northwestern Philippines. All of the species exhibited remarkable lunar periodicity in planula release, with distinct timing in the lunar calendar. Despite confinement of peak larval release between the first quarter and full moons in 4 species (Pocillopora damicornis, P. verrucosa, Stylophora pistillata, and Seriatopora guttatus), only the 2 Pocillopora species experienced significant overlap in release times. Disparate lunar timing, on the other hand, was exhibited by the 3 Seriatopora species (new moon for S. caliendrum, last quarter moon for S. hystrix, and full moon for S. guttatus) during warm-dry months, although during seasons with low planulation rates the timing for the former 2 species seemed to overlap. Generally, lunar reproductive patterns in each species were seasonally consistent despite strong variations in larval output. The highest rates of planulation were recorded during the warm-dry months (March to May) and the lowest during the warm-wet months (June to October), except for P. damicornis, in which the lowest rate occurred during the cool-dry months (November to February). The timing of release in P. damicornis is mainly during the dark period of the diel cycle, with a peak at ca. 02:30 h. This report highlights the variation in timing of planulation among closely related coral species and compares temporal planulation data in the Philippines, which lies within the Indo-West Pacific center of coral diversity, to available data on brooding pocilloporid corals from other biogeographic regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据