4.7 Article

Authigenic carbonates from methane seeps of the northern Congo fan: Microbial formation mechanism

期刊

MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 748-756

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.08.006

关键词

Methane; Seep; Carbonate; Isotopes; Rare earth elements; Trace elements; Seepage rate; Congo fan

资金

  1. 973 Program [2009CB219506]
  2. NSF of China [40725011, U0733003]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through the DFG-Excellence Cluster MARUM, Bremen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Authigenic carbonates were collected from methane seeps at Hydrate Hole at 3113 m water depth and Diapir Field at 2417 m water depth on the northern Congo deep-sea fan during RV Meteor cruise M56. The carbonate samples analyzed here are nodules, mainly composed of aragonite and high-Mg calcite. Abundant putative microbial carbonate rods and associated pyrite framboids were recognized within the carbonate matrix. The delta C-13 values of the Hydrate Hole carbonates range from -62.5 parts per thousand to -46.3 parts per thousand PDB, while the delta C-13 values of the Diapir Field carbonate are somewhat higher, ranging from -40.7 parts per thousand to -30.7 parts per thousand PDB, indicating that methane is the predominant carbon source at both locations. Relative enrichment of O-18 (delta O-18 values as high as 5.2 parts per thousand PDB) are probably related to localized destabilization of gas hydrate. The total content of rare earth elements (REE) of 5% HNO3-treated solutions derived from carbonate samples varies from 1.6 ppm to 42.5 ppm. The shale-normalized REE patterns all display positive Ce anomalies (Ce/Ce* > 1.3), revealing that the carbonates precipitated under anoxic conditions. A sample from Hydrate Hole shows a concentric lamination, corresponding to fluctuations in delta C-13 values as well as trace elements contents. These fluctuations are presumed to reflect changes of seepage flux. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据